Cape Verde vs Solomon Islands: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Cape Verde
12.5
in 2019
Solomon Islands
25
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
138th
Solomon Islands rank
135th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Cape Verde
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 25 against 12.5 in Cape Verde, a difference of 12.5.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 2.0 times Cape Verde's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 138th and Solomon Islands ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Cape Verde or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 25 against 12.5 in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Cape Verde and Solomon Islands?
- 12.5, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Solomon Islands rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Cape Verde ranks 138th and Solomon Islands ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.