Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands

Solomon Islands: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff was 25 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
135th
of 191 countries
All-time high
25
in 2016
All-time low
12.5
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands, 2014–2019

05101520252014201620192014: 12.52015: 12.52016: 252017: 12.52018: 252019: 25

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands is 25, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% over ten years.

Solomon Islands ranks 135th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Solomon Islands, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 12.5
2015 12.5 +0.0%
2016 25 +100.0%
2017 12.5 -50.0%
2018 25 +100.0%
2019 25 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Solomon Islands

  1. 135 Angola 25 compare
  2. 135 Honduras 25 compare
  3. 138 Cape Verde 12.5 compare
  4. 138 Myanmar 12.5 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Solomon Islands

All data for Solomon Islands →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands?
Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands was 25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Solomon Islands?
The highest recorded value was 25 in 2016.
What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Solomon Islands?
The lowest recorded value was 12.5 in 2014.
How does Solomon Islands rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
Solomon Islands ranks 135th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff rising or falling in Solomon Islands?
Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Solomon Islands data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20-2/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20-2/solomon-islands/">Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Solomon Islands</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.