Brazil vs Grenada: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Brazil
6.64 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada
6.36 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Brazil rank
32nd
Grenada rank
34th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Brazil
- Grenada
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 6.64 DB16-20 methodology against 6.36 DB16-20 methodology in Grenada, a difference of 0.28 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 32nd and Grenada ranks 34th of 125 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Brazil or Grenada?
- Brazil, at 6.64 DB16-20 methodology against 6.36 DB16-20 methodology in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Brazil and Grenada?
- 0.28 DB16-20 methodology, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Grenada?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Grenada rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Brazil ranks 32nd and Grenada ranks 34th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.