Croatia vs Philippines: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Croatia
3.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines
3.57 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Croatia rank
52nd
Philippines rank
51st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Croatia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 3.57 DB16-20 methodology against 3.3 DB16-20 methodology in Croatia, a difference of 0.27 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 51st of 127 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Croatia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 3.57 DB16-20 methodology against 3.3 DB16-20 methodology in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Croatia and Philippines?
- 0.27 DB16-20 methodology, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Philippines rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Croatia ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 51st of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.