Finland vs Switzerland: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Finland
0.2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Switzerland
0.2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland rank
116th
Switzerland rank
116th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Finland
- Switzerland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.2 DB16-20 methodology against 0.2 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Switzerland ahead.
Finland ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 116th of 125 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Finland or Switzerland?
- Finland, at 0.2 DB16-20 methodology against 0.2 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Finland and Switzerland?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Switzerland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Switzerland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Finland ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 116th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.