New Zealand vs Philippines: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
New Zealand
3.77 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines
3.57 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
48th
Philippines rank
50th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 3.77 DB16-20 methodology against 3.57 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 0.2 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Philippines ahead.
New Zealand ranks 48th and Philippines ranks 50th of 126 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 3.77 DB16-20 methodology against 3.57 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0.2 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- New Zealand ranks 48th and Philippines ranks 50th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.