Niger vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Niger
165 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
940 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Niger rank
3rd
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Niger
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 940 DB16-20 methodology against 165 DB16-20 methodology in Niger, a difference of 775 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 5.7 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Niger ahead.
Niger ranks 3rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 126 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Niger or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 940 DB16-20 methodology against 165 DB16-20 methodology in Niger as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Niger and Papua New Guinea?
- 775 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Niger and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Niger ranks 3rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.