Philippines vs Serbia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Philippines
3.57 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
3.85 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines rank
49th
Serbia rank
46th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.85 DB16-20 methodology against 3.57 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 0.28 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 46th of 125 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.85 DB16-20 methodology against 3.57 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Philippines and Serbia?
- 0.28 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Philippines ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 46th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.