Chinese Taipei vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index

Chinese Taipei
0.27 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
0.25 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chinese Taipei rank
113th
United Arab Emirates rank
114th

Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time

  • Chinese Taipei
  • United Arab Emirates
00.20.40.60.8201420162019

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 0.27 DB16-20 methodology against 0.25 DB16-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.

Chinese Taipei ranks 113th and United Arab Emirates ranks 114th of 126 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Chinese Taipei or United Arab Emirates?
Chinese Taipei, at 0.27 DB16-20 methodology against 0.25 DB16-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates?
0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
Chinese Taipei ranks 113th and United Arab Emirates ranks 114th of 126 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chinese Taipei vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-duration-index-saidi-db16-20-methodology/taiwan/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-duration-index-saidi-db16-20-methodology/taiwan/united-arab-emirates/">Chinese Taipei vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 752 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.