Taiwan vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Taiwan
0.27 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
0.25 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Taiwan rank
114th
United Arab Emirates rank
115th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Taiwan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Taiwan currently reports 0.27 DB16-20 methodology against 0.25 DB16-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Taiwan's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Taiwan ahead.
Taiwan ranks 114th and United Arab Emirates ranks 115th of 127 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Taiwan or United Arab Emirates?
- Taiwan, at 0.27 DB16-20 methodology against 0.25 DB16-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Taiwan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Taiwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Taiwan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Taiwan ranks 114th and United Arab Emirates ranks 115th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.