Antigua and Barbuda vs New Zealand: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Antigua and Barbuda
2.12 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
2.14 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
59th
New Zealand rank
58th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2.14 DB16-20 methodology against 2.12 DB16-20 methodology in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 58th of 126 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Antigua and Barbuda or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 2.14 DB16-20 methodology against 2.12 DB16-20 methodology in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 58th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.