Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology) by country

The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.

Countries reporting
126
Highest
500 DB16-20 methodology
Papua New Guinea
Lowest
0.024 DB16-20 methodology
Japan
Median
1.58 DB16-20 methodology
Years covered
6
2014–2019
Data points
753

What the numbers show

Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology) is currently reported for 126 countries. The highest value is 500 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea; the lowest is 0.024 DB16-20 methodology in Japan.

The median across all reporting countries is 1.58 DB16-20 methodology, and the mean is 11.75 DB16-20 methodology.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 20,833.

Over the past decade 40 countries rose and 81 fell. The largest increase was in Singapore (up 1,000.0%), and the largest decrease in Vietnam (down 90.3%).

Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Papua New Guinea 500 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 346.4% volatile
2 Niger 288 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 117.1% rising
3 Guyana 106 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 68.3% rising
4 Uganda 49.81 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 50.5% rising
5 Tanzania 46.77 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 22.1% falling
6 Nicaragua 45.7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 8.1% rising
7 Paraguay 22.8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 44.3% rising
8 Albania 22 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 58.7% falling
9 Turkey 19.53 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 290.6% rising
10 Cote d'Ivoire 18 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 27.0% falling
11 Samoa 15.77 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 36.9% falling
12 Cambodia 15.35 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 84.8% volatile
13 Mongolia 15 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 36.4% rising
14 Sudan 14.4 DB16-20 methodology 2018 — falling
15 Argentina 14.39 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 3.2% flat
16 North Macedonia 14.18 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 14.2% falling
17 Belize 13.78 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 11.1% falling
18 Cape Verde 13.1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 18.6% flat
19 Jamaica 10.71 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 32.8% falling
20 Algeria 9.85 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 10.8% flat
21 Palestine 9.48 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 31.8% falling
22 Tonga 9.2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 37.4% falling
23 Palau 8.9 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 69.3% falling
24 Bolivia 8.6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 44.2% falling
25 Armenia 7.2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 39.5% rising
26 Dominican Republic 6.9 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 34.9% falling
26 Kenya 6.9 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 86.9% volatile
28 Grenada 6.61 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 233.8% rising
29 Barbados 6.01 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 22.2% falling
30 Kosovo 5.89 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 81.0% volatile
30 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 5.89 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 81.0% volatile
32 Iran 5.3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 6.2% flat
33 Panama 5.19 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 180.5% volatile
34 Vanuatu 5.14 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 20.9% falling
35 Bulgaria 5.01 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 1.8% flat
36 Zambia 4.91 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 48.7% falling
37 Puerto Rico 4.83 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 0.6% flat
38 Fiji 4.74 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 47.3% falling
39 San Marino 4.67 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 76.2% volatile
40 Uruguay 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 25.8% rising
41 Trinidad and Tobago 3.86 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 13.6% falling
42 Colombia 3.8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 42.2% falling
43 Brazil 3.72 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 37.1% falling
44 Georgia 3.69 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 82.7% rising
45 Romania 3.35 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 11.6% falling
46 Ecuador 3.3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 58.8% falling
47 El Salvador 3.23 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 54.1% falling
48 Serbia 3.11 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 14.3% flat
49 Sri Lanka 2.98 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 76.0% volatile
50 Bhutan 2.88 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 53.2% volatile
51 Guatemala 2.7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 0.4% falling
52 India 2.38 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 62.7% falling
53 Tunisia 2.28 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 2.6% flat
54 Morocco 2.23 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 142.4% rising
54 Philippines 2.23 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 34.6% falling
56 Italy 2.22 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 4.7% falling
57 Indonesia 2.18 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 25.8% flat
58 New Zealand 2.14 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 111.9% rising
59 Antigua and Barbuda 2.12 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 76.2% falling
60 Israel 2.04 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 39.6% falling
61 Malta 1.83 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 53.1% falling
62 Peru 1.73 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 76.9% volatile
63 Croatia 1.58 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 25.5% falling
64 Jordan 1.57 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 14.7% falling
64 Ukraine 1.57 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 34.3% falling
64 Vietnam 1.57 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 90.3% volatile
67 Saudi Arabia 1.56 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 56.0% rising
68 Moldova 1.5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 25.7% falling
69 Canada 1.48 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 10.4% rising
70 Chile 1.47 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 12.5% falling
71 Solomon Islands 1.45 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 81.9% volatile
72 Greece 1.44 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 10.0% flat
73 Norway 1.3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 35.0% falling
74 Hungary 1.23 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 16.3% falling
75 Oman 1.13 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — falling
76 Poland 1.09 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 31.9% falling
77 Azerbaijan 0.96 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 53.4% falling
78 Kazakhstan 0.91 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 67.3% falling
79 Mexico 0.8516 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 20.7% falling
80 Mauritius 0.85 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 46.6% rising
81 Bahrain 0.72 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 35.1% falling
81 Thailand 0.72 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 56.6% falling
83 Spain 0.71 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 24.6% rising
84 Slovakia 0.68 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 6.8% falling
85 Sweden 0.66 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 52.9% falling
86 Austria 0.61 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 19.7% falling
86 Portugal 0.61 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 16.4% falling
88 Australia 0.6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 17.8% falling
89 Ireland 0.57 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 256.2% volatile
90 Netherlands 0.54 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 54.3% rising
91 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.51 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 54.5% falling
92 Denmark 0.5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
93 Malaysia 0.49 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 32.4% rising
94 Belarus 0.48 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 380.0% volatile
95 Kuwait 0.42 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 49.4% falling
95 Latvia 0.42 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 85.5% volatile
97 Iceland 0.41 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 78.3% rising
98 Belgium 0.4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 41.2% falling
98 Lithuania 0.4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 11.1% falling
100 United States 0.378 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 1.6% rising
101 Czechia 0.35 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 5.4% flat
102 Saint Lucia 0.34 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 37.0% falling
103 Brunei 0.33 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 70.0% falling
104 Germany 0.3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 3.4% flat
105 Dominica 0.29 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 23.7% flat
105 France 0.29 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 29.3% falling
107 Slovenia 0.27 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% volatile
108 Luxembourg 0.26 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 52.9% rising
109 United Arab Emirates 0.24 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 41.2% rising
110 Taiwan 0.23 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 11.5% falling
111 Cyprus 0.22 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 62.1% volatile
112 Costa Rica 0.21 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
113 Hong Kong 0.19 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
114 China 0.188 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 50.9% falling
115 Switzerland 0.18 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 28.6% rising
115 Estonia 0.18 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 58.1% falling
115 Namibia 0.18 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 28.0% falling
118 Finland 0.16 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 61.9% falling
119 Seychelles 0.15 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 90.0% volatile
120 United Kingdom 0.14 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 44.0% falling
121 Singapore 0.11 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 1,000.0% volatile
122 Uzbekistan 0.08 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 20.0% falling
123 Russia 0.053 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 657.1% volatile
124 South Korea 0.05 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 37.5% falling
125 Qatar 0.04 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 85.7% falling
126 Japan 0.024 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 75.5% falling

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-frequency-index-saifi-db16-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-frequency-index-saifi-db16-20-methodology/">Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 753 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.