Argentina vs Cape Verde: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Argentina
14.39 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cape Verde
13.1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Argentina rank
15th
Cape Verde rank
18th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Argentina
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 14.39 DB16-20 methodology against 13.1 DB16-20 methodology in Cape Verde, a difference of 1.29 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Argentina ranks 15th and Cape Verde ranks 18th of 124 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Argentina or Cape Verde?
- Argentina, at 14.39 DB16-20 methodology against 13.1 DB16-20 methodology in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Argentina and Cape Verde?
- 1.29 DB16-20 methodology, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cape Verde?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Cape Verde rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Argentina ranks 15th and Cape Verde ranks 18th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.