Australia vs Austria: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Australia
0.6 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria
0.61 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
86th
Austria rank
84th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Australia
- Austria
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.61 DB16-20 methodology against 0.6 DB16-20 methodology in Australia, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Austria ahead.
Australia ranks 86th and Austria ranks 84th of 124 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Australia or Austria?
- Austria, at 0.61 DB16-20 methodology against 0.6 DB16-20 methodology in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Australia and Austria?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Austria?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Austria rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Australia ranks 86th and Austria ranks 84th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.