Australia vs Netherlands: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
Australia
0.6 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Netherlands
0.54 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
88th
Netherlands rank
90th
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- Australia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.6 DB16-20 methodology against 0.54 DB16-20 methodology in Netherlands, a difference of 0.06 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 88th and Netherlands ranks 90th of 126 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Australia or Netherlands?
- Australia, at 0.6 DB16-20 methodology against 0.54 DB16-20 methodology in Netherlands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Australia and Netherlands?
- 0.06 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Netherlands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Netherlands rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Australia ranks 88th and Netherlands ranks 90th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.