Australia vs Sweden: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Australia
0.6 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
0.66 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
86th
Sweden rank
83rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Australia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.66 DB16-20 methodology against 0.6 DB16-20 methodology in Australia, a difference of 0.06 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sweden ahead.
Australia ranks 86th and Sweden ranks 83rd of 124 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Australia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.66 DB16-20 methodology against 0.6 DB16-20 methodology in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Australia and Sweden?
- 0.06 DB16-20 methodology, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Sweden rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Australia ranks 86th and Sweden ranks 83rd of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.