Belarus vs Denmark: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Belarus
0.48 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Belarus rank
92nd
Denmark rank
90th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Belarus
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Belarus, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 92nd and Denmark ranks 90th of 124 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Belarus or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Belarus and Denmark?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Denmark?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Denmark rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Belarus ranks 92nd and Denmark ranks 90th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.