Belarus vs Malaysia: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
Belarus
0.48 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
0.49 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Belarus rank
94th
Malaysia rank
93rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- Belarus
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.49 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Belarus, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 94th and Malaysia ranks 93rd of 126 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Belarus or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.49 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Belarus and Malaysia?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Malaysia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Belarus ranks 94th and Malaysia ranks 93rd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.