Belgium vs Iceland: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Belgium
0.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland
0.41 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Belgium rank
96th
Iceland rank
95th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Belgium
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.41 DB16-20 methodology against 0.4 DB16-20 methodology in Belgium, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 96th and Iceland ranks 95th of 124 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Belgium or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0.41 DB16-20 methodology against 0.4 DB16-20 methodology in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Belgium and Iceland?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Iceland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Belgium ranks 96th and Iceland ranks 95th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.