Bhutan vs Serbia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Bhutan
2.88 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
3.11 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Bhutan rank
48th
Serbia rank
46th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Bhutan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.11 DB16-20 methodology against 2.88 DB16-20 methodology in Bhutan, a difference of 0.23 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Serbia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 46th of 124 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Bhutan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.11 DB16-20 methodology against 2.88 DB16-20 methodology in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Bhutan and Serbia?
- 0.23 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Serbia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Bhutan ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 46th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.