Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Denmark: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.51 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
91st
Denmark rank
92nd
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Denmark
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.51 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Denmark, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 91st and Denmark ranks 92nd of 126 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Denmark?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.51 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 91st and Denmark ranks 92nd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.