Chile vs Norway: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Chile
1.47 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Norway
1.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
68th
Norway rank
71st
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Chile
- Norway
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1.47 DB16-20 methodology against 1.3 DB16-20 methodology in Norway, a difference of 0.17 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Norway ahead.
Chile ranks 68th and Norway ranks 71st of 124 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Chile or Norway?
- Chile, at 1.47 DB16-20 methodology against 1.3 DB16-20 methodology in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Chile and Norway?
- 0.17 DB16-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Norway rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Chile ranks 68th and Norway ranks 71st of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.