China vs Hong Kong (China): Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
China
0.188 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong (China)
0.19 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
113th
Hong Kong (China) rank
112th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- China
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.188 DB16-20 methodology in China, a difference of 0.002 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China ahead.
China ranks 113th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th of 125 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, China or Hong Kong (China)?
- Hong Kong (China), at 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.188 DB16-20 methodology in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between China and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0.002 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hong Kong (China)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- China ranks 113th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.