China vs Namibia: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
China
0.188 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia
0.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
114th
Namibia rank
115th
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- China
- Namibia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.188 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 0.008 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 114th and Namibia ranks 115th of 126 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, China or Namibia?
- China, at 0.188 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between China and Namibia?
- 0.008 DB16-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Namibia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- China ranks 114th and Namibia ranks 115th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.