China vs Switzerland: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
China
0.188 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Switzerland
0.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
114th
Switzerland rank
115th
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- China
- Switzerland
How they compare
China currently reports 0.188 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland, a difference of 0.008 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China ahead.
China ranks 114th and Switzerland ranks 115th of 126 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, China or Switzerland?
- China, at 0.188 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between China and Switzerland?
- 0.008 DB16-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Switzerland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Switzerland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- China ranks 114th and Switzerland ranks 115th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.