Cote d'Ivoire vs Mongolia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Cote d'Ivoire
18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mongolia
15 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
10th
Mongolia rank
13th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 18 DB16-20 methodology against 15 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 3 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 124 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Cote d'Ivoire or Mongolia?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 18 DB16-20 methodology against 15 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Cote d'Ivoire and Mongolia?
- 3 DB16-20 methodology, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Mongolia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.