Cote d'Ivoire vs Samoa: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Cote d'Ivoire
18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
15.77 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
10th
Samoa rank
11th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Samoa
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 18 DB16-20 methodology against 15.77 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 2.23 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Samoa ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 10th and Samoa ranks 11th of 124 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Cote d'Ivoire or Samoa?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 18 DB16-20 methodology against 15.77 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Cote d'Ivoire and Samoa?
- 2.23 DB16-20 methodology, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Samoa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Samoa rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 10th and Samoa ranks 11th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.