Denmark vs Malaysia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Denmark
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
0.49 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark rank
90th
Malaysia rank
91st
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Denmark
- Malaysia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.49 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 90th and Malaysia ranks 91st of 124 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Denmark or Malaysia?
- Denmark, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.49 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Denmark and Malaysia?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Malaysia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Denmark ranks 90th and Malaysia ranks 91st of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.