Ecuador vs Georgia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Ecuador
3.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Georgia
3.69 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador rank
44th
Georgia rank
42nd
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Ecuador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3.69 DB16-20 methodology against 3.3 DB16-20 methodology in Ecuador, a difference of 0.39 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Georgia ranks 42nd of 124 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Ecuador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 3.69 DB16-20 methodology against 3.3 DB16-20 methodology in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Ecuador and Georgia?
- 0.39 DB16-20 methodology, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Georgia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Georgia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Georgia ranks 42nd of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.