El Salvador vs Romania: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
El Salvador
3.23 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
3.35 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
El Salvador rank
45th
Romania rank
43rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3.35 DB16-20 methodology against 3.23 DB16-20 methodology in El Salvador, a difference of 0.12 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 45th and Romania ranks 43rd of 124 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, El Salvador or Romania?
- Romania, at 3.35 DB16-20 methodology against 3.23 DB16-20 methodology in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between El Salvador and Romania?
- 0.12 DB16-20 methodology, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- El Salvador ranks 45th and Romania ranks 43rd of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.