Estonia vs Finland: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Estonia
0.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland
0.16 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia rank
113th
Finland rank
116th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Estonia
- Finland
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.18 DB16-20 methodology against 0.16 DB16-20 methodology in Finland, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 113th and Finland ranks 116th of 124 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Estonia or Finland?
- Estonia, at 0.18 DB16-20 methodology against 0.16 DB16-20 methodology in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Estonia and Finland?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Finland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Finland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Estonia ranks 113th and Finland ranks 116th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.