Estonia vs Hong Kong: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
Estonia
0.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong
0.19 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Estonia rank
115th
Hong Kong rank
113th
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- Estonia
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Estonia, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 115th and Hong Kong ranks 113th of 126 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Estonia or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Estonia and Hong Kong?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Hong Kong rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Estonia ranks 115th and Hong Kong ranks 113th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.