How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong (China)?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Hong Kong (China): Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index

Estonia

0.18 DB16-20 methodology

in 2019

Hong Kong (China)

0.19 DB16-20 methodology

in 2019

Estonia rank

114th

Hong Kong (China) rank

112th

Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time

Estonia
Hong Kong (China)

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Estonia, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Hong Kong (China)'s figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 114th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th of 125 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Estonia or Hong Kong (China)?: Hong Kong (China), at 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Estonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Estonia and Hong Kong (China)?: 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong (China)?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Estonia and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?: Estonia ranks 114th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Hong Kong (China): Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-frequency-index-saifi-db16-20-methodology/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-frequency-index-saifi-db16-20-methodology/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Estonia vs Hong Kong (China): Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit: DB16-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 125 places, 747 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.