Finland vs Singapore: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Finland
0.16 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
0.11 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland rank
116th
Singapore rank
119th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Finland
- Singapore
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.16 DB16-20 methodology against 0.11 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0.05 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.5 times Singapore's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 116th and Singapore ranks 119th of 124 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Finland or Singapore?
- Finland, at 0.16 DB16-20 methodology against 0.11 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Finland and Singapore?
- 0.05 DB16-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Singapore rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Finland ranks 116th and Singapore ranks 119th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.