Guatemala vs Serbia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Guatemala
2.7 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
3.11 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Guatemala rank
49th
Serbia rank
46th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.11 DB16-20 methodology against 2.7 DB16-20 methodology in Guatemala, a difference of 0.41 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 46th of 124 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.11 DB16-20 methodology against 2.7 DB16-20 methodology in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 0.41 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Guatemala ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 46th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.