Guyana vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Guyana
106 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
500 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Guyana rank
3rd
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Guyana
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 500 DB16-20 methodology against 106 DB16-20 methodology in Guyana, a difference of 394 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 4.7 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Guyana ranks 3rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 124 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Guyana or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 500 DB16-20 methodology against 106 DB16-20 methodology in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Guyana and Papua New Guinea?
- 394 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Guyana ranks 3rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.