Hong Kong vs Namibia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Hong Kong
0.19 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia
0.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
111th
Namibia rank
113th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Hong Kong
- Namibia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Namibia ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 113th of 124 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Hong Kong or Namibia?
- Hong Kong, at 0.19 DB16-20 methodology against 0.18 DB16-20 methodology in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Hong Kong and Namibia?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Namibia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Hong Kong ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 113th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.