Hong Kong (China) vs Chinese Taipei: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index

Hong Kong (China)
0.19 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
0.23 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong (China) rank
112th
Chinese Taipei rank
109th

Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time

  • Hong Kong (China)
  • Chinese Taipei
00.10.20.3201420162019

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 0.23 DB16-20 methodology against 0.19 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.04 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong (China)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 109th of 125 countries.

Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Hong Kong (China) or Chinese Taipei?
Chinese Taipei, at 0.23 DB16-20 methodology against 0.19 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong (China) as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Hong Kong (China) and Chinese Taipei?
0.04 DB16-20 methodology, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Chinese Taipei?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 109th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Chinese Taipei: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-frequency-index-saifi-db16-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-system-average-interruption-frequency-index-saifi-db16-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/taiwan/">Hong Kong (China) vs Chinese Taipei: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
125 places, 747 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.