Iceland vs Latvia: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
Iceland
0.41 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
0.42 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland rank
97th
Latvia rank
95th
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- Iceland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.42 DB16-20 methodology against 0.41 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Iceland ranks 97th and Latvia ranks 95th of 126 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Iceland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.42 DB16-20 methodology against 0.41 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Iceland and Latvia?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Latvia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Iceland ranks 97th and Latvia ranks 95th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.