Iceland vs Lithuania: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Iceland
0.41 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Lithuania
0.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland rank
95th
Lithuania rank
96th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Iceland
- Lithuania
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.41 DB16-20 methodology against 0.4 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lithuania ahead.
Iceland ranks 95th and Lithuania ranks 96th of 124 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Iceland or Lithuania?
- Iceland, at 0.41 DB16-20 methodology against 0.4 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Iceland and Lithuania?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Lithuania rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Iceland ranks 95th and Lithuania ranks 96th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.