Indonesia vs Israel: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Indonesia
2.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Israel
2.04 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia rank
55th
Israel rank
58th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Indonesia
- Israel
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 2.18 DB16-20 methodology against 2.04 DB16-20 methodology in Israel, a difference of 0.14 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Israel ahead.
Indonesia ranks 55th and Israel ranks 58th of 124 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Indonesia or Israel?
- Indonesia, at 2.18 DB16-20 methodology against 2.04 DB16-20 methodology in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Indonesia and Israel?
- 0.14 DB16-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Israel?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Israel rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Indonesia ranks 55th and Israel ranks 58th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.