Indonesia vs New Zealand: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Indonesia
2.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
2.14 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia rank
56th
New Zealand rank
57th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Indonesia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 2.18 DB16-20 methodology against 2.14 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0.04 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 125 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Indonesia or New Zealand?
- Indonesia, at 2.18 DB16-20 methodology against 2.14 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Indonesia and New Zealand?
- 0.04 DB16-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and New Zealand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Indonesia ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.