Israel vs New Zealand: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Israel
2.04 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
2.14 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Israel rank
59th
New Zealand rank
57th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2.14 DB16-20 methodology against 2.04 DB16-20 methodology in Israel, a difference of 0.1 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 125 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 2.14 DB16-20 methodology against 2.04 DB16-20 methodology in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.1 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Israel ranks 59th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.