Japan vs South Korea: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Japan
0.024 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea
0.05 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan rank
124th
South Korea rank
122nd
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Japan
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.05 DB16-20 methodology against 0.024 DB16-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0.026 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes South Korea's figure about 2.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 124th and South Korea ranks 122nd of 124 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Japan or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 0.05 DB16-20 methodology against 0.024 DB16-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Japan and South Korea?
- 0.026 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and South Korea rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Japan ranks 124th and South Korea ranks 122nd of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.