South Korea vs Russia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
South Korea
0.05 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Russia
0.053 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea rank
122nd
Russia rank
121st
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- South Korea
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0.053 DB16-20 methodology against 0.05 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea, a difference of 0.003 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 122nd and Russia ranks 121st of 124 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, South Korea or Russia?
- Russia, at 0.053 DB16-20 methodology against 0.05 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between South Korea and Russia?
- 0.003 DB16-20 methodology, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Russia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Russia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- South Korea ranks 122nd and Russia ranks 121st of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.