South Korea vs Singapore: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
South Korea
0.05 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
0.11 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea rank
124th
Singapore rank
121st
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- South Korea
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.11 DB16-20 methodology against 0.05 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea, a difference of 0.06 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Singapore's figure about 2.2 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 124th and Singapore ranks 121st of 126 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, South Korea or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.11 DB16-20 methodology against 0.05 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between South Korea and Singapore?
- 0.06 DB16-20 methodology, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Singapore rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- South Korea ranks 124th and Singapore ranks 121st of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.