South Korea vs Uzbekistan: Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency
South Korea
0.05 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
0.08 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea rank
124th
Uzbekistan rank
122nd
Getting electricity: System average interruption … frequency over time
- South Korea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.08 DB16-20 methodology against 0.05 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea, a difference of 0.03 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.6 times South Korea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 124th and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 126 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, South Korea or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.08 DB16-20 methodology against 0.05 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between South Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 0.03 DB16-20 methodology, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Uzbekistan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- South Korea ranks 124th and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.