Latvia vs Lithuania: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Latvia
0.42 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Lithuania
0.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
93rd
Lithuania rank
96th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Latvia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.42 DB16-20 methodology against 0.4 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 93rd and Lithuania ranks 96th of 124 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Latvia or Lithuania?
- Latvia, at 0.42 DB16-20 methodology against 0.4 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Latvia and Lithuania?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Latvia ranks 93rd and Lithuania ranks 96th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.