Luxembourg vs Taiwan: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Luxembourg
0.26 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Taiwan
0.23 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
106th
Taiwan rank
108th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Luxembourg
- Taiwan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.26 DB16-20 methodology against 0.23 DB16-20 methodology in Taiwan, a difference of 0.03 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Taiwan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Taiwan ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 106th and Taiwan ranks 108th of 124 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Luxembourg or Taiwan?
- Luxembourg, at 0.26 DB16-20 methodology against 0.23 DB16-20 methodology in Taiwan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Luxembourg and Taiwan?
- 0.03 DB16-20 methodology, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Taiwan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Luxembourg and Taiwan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Luxembourg ranks 106th and Taiwan ranks 108th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.