Malaysia vs Netherlands: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Malaysia
0.49 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Netherlands
0.54 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
91st
Netherlands rank
88th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Malaysia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 0.54 DB16-20 methodology against 0.49 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0.05 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 91st and Netherlands ranks 88th of 124 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Malaysia or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 0.54 DB16-20 methodology against 0.49 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Malaysia and Netherlands?
- 0.05 DB16-20 methodology, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Netherlands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Netherlands rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Malaysia ranks 91st and Netherlands ranks 88th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.