Malta vs New Zealand: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Malta
1.83 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
2.14 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta rank
60th
New Zealand rank
57th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Malta
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2.14 DB16-20 methodology against 1.83 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0.31 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 125 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Malta or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 2.14 DB16-20 methodology against 1.83 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Malta and New Zealand?
- 0.31 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Malta ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 57th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.