Norway vs Poland: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Norway
1.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Poland
1.09 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Norway rank
71st
Poland rank
74th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Norway
- Poland
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1.3 DB16-20 methodology against 1.09 DB16-20 methodology in Poland, a difference of 0.21 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 71st and Poland ranks 74th of 124 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Norway or Poland?
- Norway, at 1.3 DB16-20 methodology against 1.09 DB16-20 methodology in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Norway and Poland?
- 0.21 DB16-20 methodology, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Norway and Poland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Norway ranks 71st and Poland ranks 74th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.